25 April 2012

Lower order triumph: Sexual Selection

In the Descent of Man, Darwin explains to us how we “higher order” creatures were derived from simpler organisms of a “lower order”. In the picture that he paints the conditions and the world in which our ancestors had to survive slowly but surely forged our mind and various other traits into the state they are in today, through the generations, via natural selection. Among the ‘higher order’ traits he mentions is man’s great capacity for morality and reasoning. It is these traits that we see revered in Natural selection and Scientific wooing by Constance Naden. In these poems the baser, ‘lower order’ attributes of man are held almost with contempt? In Natural selection Constance writes “ Of Science he hasn’t a trace/ He seeks not the How and the Why,/ But he sings with an amateurs grace,/ and he dances much better then I…….Tis a low that with Aves prevails/ and even in homo survives….Ah no! for since Chloe is false, I’m certain that Darwin is true!”. Is the contempt for this lower order thinking in man, and the way in which the two orders of thought and feeling are distinguished from one another not misguided? Darwin writes that our enhanced mental faculties are themselves the result of natural selection, so should we not equally praise and admire the more base faculties which the unscientific youth is filled with, the very same attributes that will win him (and not the scientist) the young girl’s affections. Should we not be slower to be so judgmental and dismissive about traits and faculties that have served our species and so many others, so well, for so many generations? 

 

1 comment:

  1. The only thing I would ask is how this relates to those traits that are "not now of any service" (p234)? What place do these traits have? If every species is supposed to evolve then it seems a mystery that such non-useful traits have continued to survive. The world in 802, 701 from the Time Machine depicts the merging of species, through evolution, into only two species. I would argue that without the traits that may be seen as unimportant, all species would be more similarly related. Eventually, if nature wins, and we lose the ability to woo and dance, we will all become Murlocks or giant man-eating lobsters.

    ReplyDelete